Self Help Options For Depression

There are so many different options out there, self help and otherwise, for depression.

I was given a rule of thumb when assessing treatments for any particular condition.

If there are lots of treatments of all different types, then NONE of them work.

If one really did work, it would remove the need for all the others.

That’s a great starting point to increase your skepticism, and keep you wary of even the latest and greatest idea, but if you have the particular itch, you need to choose something to help you scratch it.

The method above doesn’t help you to decide WHAT to choose, and with theĀ self help options for depression there is a very, very, very long list to choose from.

Fortunately someone has done a review for you.

Unfortunately this review is from back in 2002 (actually the data was taken from journals published up to August 2001, so that means the actual research was done last century, such is the natural time-lag of this type of information.)

Not surprisingly their most common finding is that the majority of self help options for depression don’t have enough decent evidence, and even the most studied ones don’t have as much support as…

“…antidepressants or face-to-face cognitive behaviour therapy, both of which are standard treatments recommended in clinical practice guidelines.”

But for what it’s worth here is their list of the depression self help options that are most likely to be beneficial:

“The [self help] treatments with the best evidence of effectiveness are St John’s Wort, exercise, bibliotherapy involving cognitive behaviour therapy and light therapy (for winter depression). There is some limited evidence to support the effectiveness of acupuncture, light therapy (for non-seasonal depression), massage therapy, negative air ionisation (for winter depression), relaxation therapy, S-adenosylmethionine, folate and yoga breathing exercises.”

They didn’t even get to Hypnosis, EFT, most other psychological therapies, and 1001 different options that have even less evidence in the medical and psychological literature.

However you can find out more on the 30+ ones they did cover, including the ones that didn’t make the grade, from their research paper:

http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/176_10_200502/jor10311_fm.html

Keep the skepticism pumping hard.

-Dr Martin Russell

Quick Fix

Isn’t it interesting how the term ‘quick fix‘ became a put-down.

Personally I don’t have a problem with offering a quick fix.

In fact quick is exactly the type of fix I want to offer. Seems sensible to me.

I mean who wants a slow fix, really?

So why would people deliberately want to emphasize to you that they are NOT offering a quick fix?

My guess is that people are focusing on the wrong half of the phrase.

It’s not about the speed. It’s whether it truly is a fix, quick or otherwise.

Quick fix‘ is a term for a cover-up, a bandaid, an incomplete job that needs to be redone properly later on. Well none of that is a fix.

If you truly fix something, it’s done.

Sometimes the fix is quick, but the results take time to show.

On this self help site you will find lots of ‘quick fixes’. In fact I’ll only offer slow fixes when I don’t have quick ones. The emphasis will be on the fixing part, and doing what you need to make the changes at the level you need them. Speed is a bonus.

Often when you solve an issue at a more fundamental level it doesn’t take long at all, AND it will be a more thorough ‘fix’ than if you worked long and hard at a more superficial level.

Partly this is because there less re-work involved in getting to the final result.

Next time you hear someone talking about a ‘quick fix’, do they really understand what they are putting down? Check for yourself on the fix side and as long as you are getting what you are really after, I say ignore the nay-sayers and go for it.

-Dr Martin Russell